6 Comments
User's avatar
Capt. Roy Harkness's avatar

This morning on my email in-tray was this charming glyph from Ben Garrison: https://grrrgraphics.com/product/collecting-maduro-original-art-collectors-item/

Up here in Woke Canuckistan one "Unacceptable Fringe" is loudly supportive of The Donald stomping into Alberta https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgpnDYnHM5I&t=881s

And this comment from Jeff Berwick which I haven't watched yet: (https://www.bitchute.com/video/WQg1jhhfsqnx/)

"REMEMBER: We’re talking about a highly corrupt, known criminal who used his high office to make billions for himself, put his country into trillions in debt, and has rolled out the military against his own citizens. Friend to pedophiles and international terrorists wanted for crimes against humanity…

The president of Venezuela did some bad things too.

Like… banning pornoraphy, gay marriages, abortions, sex changes and usury. (Wait... wasn't that what Libya’s Qaddafi also did before Killary “came, saw and he died”?)

And… no central bank or credit cards with 40% interest."

Qaddafi did that too, and come to think of it, Hitler did something similar (ditched Germany's Rothschild Central Bank).

I should warn and I may get blocked (please don't); Jeff is not exactly "Judeophilic" 🤔

And in about an hour I'm treating a 73-year-old friend to lunch who was "downsized" end of October and quite unable to afford to retire before it happened...

All very Orwellian, not to say Kafkaesque. 5 days in and already it looks to be a very interesting year.

All a matter of perspective, Dr. Lee... 🤨

So who's the pretty girl playing with fire? Shame about the nose ring.

Tereza Coraggio's avatar

Keep in mind that Unbekoming is AI for conspiracy theorists. If three book reviews/essays a day doesn't convince you, the censorship of all negative comments on the Sasha Latypova interview should. Mine is preserved in my Notes, so you can determine for yourself if quotes from Sasha herself should be deleted: https://substack.com/@thirdparadigm/note/c-195331271. It cites this article of mine: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/sashas-daughter-soph.

Once you know someone's an intelligence asset, it requires a closer look to see what the agenda is. The oil is just the first layer, imo. Your title is more accurate, I think. There's a deeper occult drive to provoke nuclear annihilation, I suspect, as the ultimate burnt sacrifice to the gods or holocaust, in other words.

It's a message to Iran, being done on the anniversary of the killing of Soleimani. Israel's diaspora minister writes, "The capture of Nicolás Maduro is not only good news for the people dwelling in Caracas; it is also a devastating blow to the global axis of evil and a clear message to Khamenei. Maduro did not run a country; he ran a criminal and drug empire that directly fueled Hezbollah and Iran.”

I don't know what to make of Unbekoming but I don't like being lied to, or covering up someone else's lies while censoring those exposing them.

J. Lee Austin's avatar

Good points Tereza, certainly gives one pause ... but I figure spreading the Engdahl message is worth it. Anything to alert my folks about an unbelievably corrupt empire that lies at every turn about its actual motive, ruins countries for their oil and threatens an entire planet for said lifeblood of control ... which goes together with democidal depopulation like peas and carrots. It's enough to make you write run-on sentences ... and abuse the ellipse 😅

I know my effect is negligible, but try I must, if only for the grands.

Many thanks for your always well-studied thoughts! 🌹

~~ j ~~

Capt. Roy Harkness's avatar

At risk of being offensive, just using the term "Conspiracy Theory" demonstrates you're already in very deep and treacherous waters; indeed, 'twixt Scylla and Scylla and Charybdis". I strongly recommend a perusal of "Conspiracy Theory in America" by one Lance deHaven-Smith. 🤔 Got to do some digging but I've already gathered among other things Nicolás had done much that has been most displeasing to the Genocide State of Isra-Hell...

Tereza Coraggio's avatar

I claim the term conspiracy theorist with pride for myself and chronicle the levels here: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/conspiracy-theorists.

My point to Johnny is that it's William Engdahl whose research Unbekoming posts an AI summary of. He borrows from Engdahl's credibility and assumes that authority for himself, lending it to his conclusions and other statements.

To do that without admitting to using AI or distinguishing where the AI stops and 'Unbekoming' begins is a lie. I actually find it useful to have Reader's Digest versions of all these books. For some it teaches me something new, for others it validates why I don't agree. But the name 'Lies is Unbekoming' is contradicted by not being honest about the AI.

Unbekoming has no name, no face, no voice. Who is Unbekoming? Maybe more importantly, who pays Unbekoming? As a conspiracy realist, that's what I'd like to know.